This rule recommends giving the widest meaning possible to the statutes and its provisions so as to include all those eventualities that the makers intended to be included. When there are multiple meanings possible to a section or a term, that meaning which gives the maximum possible relief and furthers the purpose of the legislation should be chosen.
It is an interpretation to secure remedy to the victim who is unjustly denied of relief. It should be done in such a way that mischief is suppressed and remedy is advanced.
In the case of Sant Ram v. Rajinderlal, the SC said that welfare legislation must be interpreted in a Third World perspective favoring the weaker and poor class.
No comments:
Post a Comment